Le 06/11/2019 à 12:38, Martin Husemann a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 12:31:37PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
__read_once(x)
__write_once(x, val)
The names are really not helpfull for understanding what is supposed to happen
here.
I don't know if you have a better suggestion, but it's basically the naming
convention that seems to have been used for several years already. Maybe we
could have something more explicit, like
__{read,write}_racy() or
__{read,write}_parallel() or
__{read,write}_concurrent()
But the last one is too long I think.
