On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:06:27AM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 07:45:08 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > How does that compare to the level of damage non-journaled FFS takes? > > From then on, the sandbox was easily recoverable after every panic. It > turned out fsck times on a moderately-sized SSD were bearable - > certainly shorter than writing cleanup scripts, throwing out half of > the sandbox, and 'cvs update'ing the rest.
I disabled WAPBL on my SSD too; it is `only' 232 GB and fsck-ing indeed takes a very short time, especially when comparing it to my rotational discs :) Reinoud