On 03.11.2020 23:20, co...@sdf.org wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:42:27PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:23:30PM +0100, Reinoud Zandijk wrote: >>> To be clear, do we want to (keep) supporting legacy devices? Its not >>> required >>> in 1.0 and could clean up the code a lot! >> >> Yes, we need that still, as not all hosts offer the newer ones. > > The QEMU people mentioned that even if "legacy virtio" IDs are used, > there's a bit to show that it's compatible with newer virtio. > Things that claim old virtio probably do both old & new. >
"Transitional virtio" supports both, 1.0 and 0.9. I had a draft work with the upgrade of virtio, but incomplete..
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
