On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 05:59:59PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: > Anyway, I?m much more concerned with (1). I think at the very least, alpha > and sparc64 don?t need to define their own _lock_cas() and can just use > atomic_cas_ulong()? furthermore, I think we can just let that be the default > definition unless a platform has a REALLY good reason to override it (I mean, > not even sh3 has to do so, because it aliases _lock_cas() to > atomic_cas_ulong()).
Sounds good. I wonder if there is some easy trick to make the ppc thing patchable for non-affected machines (or is that already done?) Martin
