> On Sep 12, 2021, at 6:16 PM, David Holland <dholland-t...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 03:43:24PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: >> The basic idea involves the device call mechanism I introduced a while ago. > > You still haven't explained why that needs to be untyped and based on > uncheckable string constants. I proposed something for type checking. However, there is an engineering trade-off disagreement about the requirement to reference symbols. In any case, I consider that to be an implementation detail that is unrelated to the meat of this discussion. -- thorpej
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device autoconf... Jason Thorpe
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device auto... Jason Thorpe
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device... Tobias Nygren
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI de... Jason Thorpe
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device autoconfiguratio... Tobias Nygren
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device autoconfigur... Jason Thorpe
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device autoconf... Jason Thorpe
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device autoconfiguration Taylor R Campbell
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device autoconfiguration Rin Okuyama
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device autoconfiguration David Holland
- Re: Overhaul of I2C and SPI device autoconfiguratio... Jason Thorpe