On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 14:33:26 -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote: > I'm not a fan of uioskip() as a name - I think uioadvance() would be > better. Skip implies, to my brain, that the data is being thrown > away (even if you're already consumed it).
I agree. "skip" seem to have wrong connotations (cf. dd(1)). -uwe
