On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 17:20:27 +0800, Rui-Xiang Guo wrote: > The build.sh runs on amd64 10.0 for cross compilation of evbarm GENERIC. > DDB, DDB_ONPANIC=1, DDB_HISTORY_SIZE=100 are commented out and KGDB is > enabled. > > --- db_interface.o --- > /home/rxg/10.0/usr/src/sys/arch/arm/arm32/db_interface.c:77:5: error: > conflicting type qualifiers for 'db_active' > 77 | int db_active = 0; > | ^~~~~~~~~ > In file included from > /home/rxg/10.0/usr/src/sys/arch/arm/arm32/db_interface.c:59: > /home/rxg/10.0/usr/src/sys/ddb/db_active.h:41:18: note: previous definition > of 'db_active' was here > 41 | static const int db_active __unused = 0; > | ^~~~~~~~~ > > *** Failed target: db_interface.o > > Do I miss something?
KGDB w/out DDB is probably not well tested everywhere. Other arches either include db_interface.c only for ddb (e.g. i386), or, when they include it for both, ifdef out the db_active definition (e.g. sh3) -uwe
