On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 01:06:41PM -0800, Greg A. Woods wrote: > > I used the "l" because like strlcpy they (should) check all the > > lengths and won't overrun. > > I think you may be confusing strlcpy() and strlcat().
Huh? The difference between strcpy and strlcpy is the "l" and the length checking. > There's no "checking of the length" in strlcpy(). There's > nothing to check [*]. Right, the length argument does nothing and serves no purpose. Uh huh. I don't really follow where you're coming from. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
