> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2025 11:29:38 +1100 > From: Nat Sloss <nathanialsl...@yahoo.com.au> > > The attached patch fixes it and I'd like to commit it if there are no > objections. > > maxaddr = high[numranges - 1] - m68k_ptob(1); > - high[numranges - 1] -= (m68k_round_page(MSGBUFSIZE) + m68k_ptob(1)); > + high[numranges - 1] -= (m68k_round_page(MSGBUFSIZE) + m68k_ptob(8));
Please put a comment here explaining what's going on. Is maxaddr still correct? Should you apply the same substitution on that line too? If not, the comment must explain why maxaddr has m68k_ptob(1) subtracted while high[numranges - 1] has m68k_ptob(8) subtracted.
