Thor Lancelot Simon <t...@panix.com> writes: > I think the *ability* to have more than one queueing discipline is important.
Agreed; it's critical to allow improvements and to allow NetBSD to be useful as a research platform. > Whether all (or most!) of the disciplines we already have should remain, > though, is I think a different question. Sure, but "let's drop them because we're migrating" is not a good argument. Perhaps Emmanuel can post a written design for the changes, so we can understand how hard modifing existing disciplines is, new APIs, etc.
