Matthias Petermann <[email protected]> writes: > Based on community feedback and a small naming poll, the prototype > will move forward under the name “Cells for NetBSD”. The goal and > architecture remain unchanged — the rename mainly helps to avoid > confusion with FreeBSD Jails and to emphasize that this is intended as > a NetBSD-native approach.
(Dropping netbsd-users@ as I do not like to send to multiple lists at once.) I was going to ask, and never got around to: How is this different than FreeBSD jails? If so, why? Is something wrong with FreeBSD jails? >From your page, it sounds like you are doing essentially the same thing -- which makes sense. But with renaming, apparently you aren't. I'm trying to figure out if this is just different to be different, or if there is a reason to do other than implement what FreeBSD did and use their code.
