> Is it? My feeling - deriving largely from my experience - is that NFS > is far more likely to be deployed in a private internal network than > over relatively attackable networks like the open Internet. Do you > have reason to think that feeling is wrong in the large, that "new NFS > installations" predominantly have threat models where on-the-wire > attacks are significant enough for them to find NFSv3 unacceptable? > (Honestly, my guess would be that most of them have not even formulated > their threat model.) The problem with NFSv3 is that the server believes the client. So, if one of my 150 clients gets compromised, all user data is compromised.
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Edgar Fuß
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Jason Thorpe
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Edgar Fuß
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Jason Thorpe
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? od2uvb
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? od2uvb
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Michael van Elst
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Mouse
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? od2uvb
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Mouse
- NFS security (was: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024?) Edgar Fuß
- Re: Changing NGROUPS_MAX to 1024? Piotr Meyer
- regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changing NG... od2uvb
- Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changin... Matthias Petermann
- Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changin... Reinoud Zandijk
- Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changin... Adrian Chadd
- Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changin... Michael van Elst
- Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changin... Adrian Chadd
- Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changin... Martin Husemann
- Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changin... Michael van Elst
- Re: regarding support of NFS versions (Re: Changin... Michael van Elst
