>> On Jul 15, 2026, at 1:03 PM, Greg Troxel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That sounds like it's totally ok. We have pages and pages of bloated >> kernel code already, and the same effort could probably save a page >> someplace else. > > Are these allocated even if they’re not used? If so, I would object to such > a change.
Martin did the math and we're talking another 3760 bytes of memory over the status quo -- which was judged ok with 1993 RAM sizes. Do you object for all ports, or just smallish ones? Even amd64 and aarch64?
