On 15 Oct 2005, at 19:43, jrandom at i2p.net wrote: > (re: shelving publish subscribe, I think its a reasonable idea to > delay from a workflow perspective, but not from a "lets not > duplicate i2p's functionality" view. If you think it wouldn't > take additional time and is functionally necessary for iterative > development, dig in)
I wasn't aware that I2P supports one-to-many broadcasts. Our pub/sub approach is designed such that it could support millions of users, meaning that it can be used, among other things, as a scalable replacement for RSS, that doesn't rely on polling. Matthew wants to delay it because handling the various failure cases is providing more complicated than anticipated. Ian.
