On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 08:32:46PM +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > On 15 Oct 2005, at 19:43, jrandom at i2p.net wrote: > >(re: shelving publish subscribe, I think its a reasonable idea to > > delay from a workflow perspective, but not from a "lets not > > duplicate i2p's functionality" view. If you think it wouldn't > > take additional time and is functionally necessary for iterative > > development, dig in) > > I wasn't aware that I2P supports one-to-many broadcasts. Our pub/sub > approach is designed such that it could support millions of users, > meaning that it can be used, among other things, as a scalable > replacement for RSS, that doesn't rely on polling.
Well actually it isn't scalable, as currently planned. I think there are ways to make it scalable though. > > Matthew wants to delay it because handling the various failure cases > is providing more complicated than anticipated. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20051021/28596aca/attachment.pgp>
