On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:33:32PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:16:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > We may have a number of small darknets as well as some large ones. I
> > expect that there will be one network which is significantly bigger than
> > the others though. This would hopefully assimilate smaller ones as it and
> > they grow. Obviously you only get global horizons within a given network.
> > However it will eventually be possible to migrate content between
> > networks, even if you don't have the privkey used to insert it.
> 
> Um, this doesn't make sense to me. In order to migrate content between two
> networks, you must have at least one connection to some node in both.
> This, in turn, means that your node is a part of both networks, and they
> are therefore not two separate networks but a single network, since at
> least one route exist between nodes in them - through your node, namely.

Well maybe not in terms of separate darknets, but it makes sense in
terms of a darknet and an opennet. Of course you would need two nodes,
and the migration is done manually (although in binary form).
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20050917/ab0b1b22/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to