On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:33:32PM +0300, Jusa Saari wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 20:16:40 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > We may have a number of small darknets as well as some large ones. I > > expect that there will be one network which is significantly bigger than > > the others though. This would hopefully assimilate smaller ones as it and > > they grow. Obviously you only get global horizons within a given network. > > However it will eventually be possible to migrate content between > > networks, even if you don't have the privkey used to insert it. > > Um, this doesn't make sense to me. In order to migrate content between two > networks, you must have at least one connection to some node in both. > This, in turn, means that your node is a part of both networks, and they > are therefore not two separate networks but a single network, since at > least one route exist between nodes in them - through your node, namely.
Well maybe not in terms of separate darknets, but it makes sense in terms of a darknet and an opennet. Of course you would need two nodes, and the migration is done manually (although in binary form). -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20050917/ab0b1b22/attachment.pgp>
