* Matthew Toseland <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> [2006-04-26 13:26:33]:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:19:23AM +0000, NextGen$ wrote: > > > > imho Up&p and stun are useless without multi-homming support. > > Huh? What exactly do you think is necessary prior to STUN/UP&P? Having references with multiple contact points (an "official" signed reference with possibly several addresses and an unofficial one with ip gathered from up&p, other peers, last known, ...)... And maybe the possibility within the node to have different listeners bound to different sockets. > > > > Concerning STUN, in .5 we were using a dns root server to detect our > > external IP > > . That's what STUN will provide, right?. See > > https://emu.freenetproject.org/svn/branches/legacy/unstable/src/freenet/node/IPAddressDetector.java > > and oldDetect(). > > > > And concerning UP&P ... you know my thought. > > > > NextGen$ > -- > Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
