Opennet is a high priority, but there are a few things we must do first (such as sort out our load balancing issues, and decide on exactly how opennet should be implemented).
Ian. On 8 Aug 2006, at 11:29, anonymous freenet user wrote: > > When will 'Open-net' be deployed? > > I would like very much to migrate to 0.7, but I cannot condone > doing so > until 'open-net' is active and making a wider anonymity set > operational. > > As it is, 0.7 is not sufficiently anonymous, If I start a node, get > some > refs and start inserting content, it doesn't take a whole lot of > rocket > science to figure out that new content is probably coming from the new > node. Better by far to have open-net active, this makes it a LOT > easier > for lots more people to join the 0.7 network and create a larger > crowd to > get lost in. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > Ian Clarke: Co-Founder & Chief Scientist Revver, Inc. phone: 323.871.2828 | personal blog - http://locut.us/blog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060808/7c825e81/attachment.html>
