-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ken Snider wrote:
> Wouldn't a fairly safe fix in the case of inserts be some sort of
> hashing mechanism that guarantees the validity of the insert versus what
> some peer of ours expects the hash to be for that same chunk of data?
> Something akin to a "ring of trust" for the validity of a particular
> block of data?
Sorry, I meant the validity of the response ("insert succeeded"/"insert
failed") rather than the validity of the data itself. IIRC hashes are
already used to check the validity of the data during inserts.
Cheers,
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE64cDyua14OQlJ3sRAiKCAKDqkphfqGv2kRUtex3RWuhY5HkdnQCglNEr
7RotTMEn6Kjpiw74IgXWNgo=
=PxwU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
