On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:52:15PM -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > So it's some sort of micro-trusted-third-parties thing. Hmm. Isn't the > > big worry that people will tend to just re-use their friends' install > > URIs? > > > Installer URIs would be one time use. Friend A could limit Friend B's > use of installer URIs. There is trust that the installer includes the > correct code for Freenet, yes, but it's a mechanism that allows > decentralized distribution even "by" NATted nodes that don't know how or > can't port forward, etc.
No it doesn't. Distribution is strictly by non-NATed nodes, but you can get your non-NATed friend to make a distribution page for you, right? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070306/cab0ad34/attachment.pgp>
