Matthew Toseland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:52:15PM -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote:
>
>> Matthew Toseland wrote:
>>
>>> So it's some sort of micro-trusted-third-parties thing. Hmm. Isn't the
>>> big worry that people will tend to just re-use their friends' install
>>> URIs?
>>>
>>>
>> Installer URIs would be one time use. Friend A could limit Friend B's
>> use of installer URIs. There is trust that the installer includes the
>> correct code for Freenet, yes, but it's a mechanism that allows
>> decentralized distribution even "by" NATted nodes that don't know how or
>> can't port forward, etc.
>>
>
> No it doesn't. Distribution is strictly by non-NATed nodes, but you can
> get your non-NATed friend to make a distribution page for you, right?
>
Yes, distribution is by your non-NATted friend's node. That's why the
"by" was in quotes.
