On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 23:29 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:46PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote: > > Secondly, the node should fill up each store regardless of the > > configured split point until it reaches the maximum overall store size. > > At that time, it should reduce the size of whichever store is over its > > allocation as and when the other store needs it. > > It's not easy to do online shrinking without ending up losing the most > valuable rather than the least valuable data.
What do you mean by "easy", exactly? Bob -- Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh>
