On Wednesday 09 May 2007 12:03, Michael Rogers wrote: > On a related note, is there any evidence that LRU performs better than, > say, random replacement for Freenet's purposes? IIRC there's some > evidence that LRU in a distributed cache produces too many copies of > popular data: > > http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~qlv/download/searchp2p_ics02.pdf > http://gnunet.org/papers/p2pmulti.pdf
No evidence that I know of but feel free to investigate. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070509/fb2928f7/attachment.pgp>
