On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 00:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 20:28, Bob Ham wrote: > > That was what I proposed near the start of this thread. I would note, > > as well, that the store-shrinking code should already exist for cases > > when the user reduces the configured size of the store.
> It does, but as I have already stated at least once, it is difficult to > efficiently do an online shrink while preserving the most recently used data. > > It is of course possible. One way to do it is to swap the key you'd be > deleting with the least recently used key just before truncating. What's your point? -- Bob Ham <rah at bash.sh> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070510/bb74fe1d/attachment.pgp>
