On Thursday 17 May 2007 09:45, Bob Ham wrote: > > > > > > It is of course possible. One way to do it is to swap the key > > > > > > you'd be deleting with the least recently used key just before > > > > > > truncating. > > > > > > > > > > What's your point? > > > > > > > > Obviously the latter is preferred but we can only do it on startup. > > > > > > I'm still unsure as to why you're telling us this. Is your point that > > > work still needs to be done on store shrinking? > > > > No, it's that dynamically shrinking the cache as the store grows isn't > > feasible without additional work on shrinking. > > Erm.. it isn't feasible without additional work on itself, either. Your > point is completely redundant. No code is feasible without its > dependencies.
The point is, it's significant work and not a priority right now. > > Bob -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070518/6cd2a029/attachment.pgp>
