Matthew Toseland wrote: (snip) > We should also think about randomising locations less frequently. It can take > a while to recover, and the current code randomizes roughly every 13 to 22 > hours. It may be useful to increase this significantly? Unfortunately this > parameter is very dependant on the network size and so on, it's not really > something we can get a good value for from simulations... I suggest we > increase it by say a factor of 4, and if we get major location distribution > issues, we can reduce it again.
In this regard, I've been tracking my location for some time, sampling each hour. I can't really say if what I'm seeing is expected/sane. See attached. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: location.png Type: image/png Size: 9425 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20080408/54bf50a7/attachment.png>
