Jano wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > (snip) > >> We should also think about randomising locations less frequently. It can take >> a while to recover, and the current code randomizes roughly every 13 to 22 >> hours. It may be useful to increase this significantly? Unfortunately this >> parameter is very dependant on the network size and so on, it's not really >> something we can get a good value for from simulations... I suggest we >> increase it by say a factor of 4, and if we get major location distribution >> issues, we can reduce it again. >> > > In this regard, I've been tracking my location for some time, sampling each > hour. I can't really say if what I'm seeing is expected/sane. See attached. >
Interesting. I think also avg. store location and maybe hit location would be interesting, too, no? --- John B?ckstrand
