On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 18:51 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > This is interesting because it came at the end of a thread on Frost where the > OP was arguing that Freenet shouldn't filter JPEGs. (Freenet strips out EXIF > data and other unknown chunks from JPEGs on download to maximize security; in > the future we will do something similar on inserts).
IMHO changing in any way information inserted in Freenet *must* be documented, evident in user interface, up by default but easily user selectable. -- +--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+ | il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello | | the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother | | Marco A. Calamari marcoc at marcoc.it http://www.marcoc.it | | DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20080229/0ea04961/attachment.pgp>
