On Tuesday 04 March 2008 18:04, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > In the current discussions I miss one thing. Everyone wants to start > his own thingy. > It would be much more effective if all interested parties get > together, decide about a design > and then implement it _together_! SomeDude wrote fms and got some > experience with the > web of trust, now we start a WoT from scratch. Seagull already has a > working (not completed) > version of FMS in Java, but we start something different?
It would be great to see some code! > Is the FMS port unneeded then? Or should WoT and FMS be competitors? > > No offense, I just wanted to read your thinkings about this :) > > I also experienced this with Frost: I am the only true Frost developer > for a long time now, > and again and again someone came up with its own new tools. I love > competition, but > as you all know there is alot to do in Frost, and we would have made a > much better tool > for all users if we would have worked together on Frost. Well, with FMS, hopefully there will only be one implementation for the foreseeable future. I get the impression batosai is getting impatient though. I would be if I wasn't barred from working on it. :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20080304/7f37fea1/attachment.pgp>
