While we didn't move to 389 from NIS, we *did* set up a pair of 389 servers for another ldap-based project. Overall, I was pretty impressed. Much simpler, and much more robust, than manually building and setting up openLDAP goodies, in my opinion...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Kent C. Brodie Department of Physiology (and) Human and Molecular Genetics Center Medical College of Wisconsin bro...@mcw.edu +1 414 955 8590 -----Original Message----- From: tech-boun...@lopsa.org [mailto:tech-boun...@lopsa.org] On Behalf Of Clif Smith Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 5:40 PM To: tech@lopsa.org Subject: Re: [lopsa-tech] NIS/YP Replacement I'm in a similar situation and am wondering if anyone has tried using the 389 Directory Server and it's AD password and group sync? The 389 project is the defendant to the Netscape|Sun|iPlanet|Fedora Directory Server and the open source basis that the Red Hat Directory Server is built from. - http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ - http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:WindowsSync cjs _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
