[+misc@, for users not subscribed to tech@] On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Matthew Dempsky <matt...@dempsky.org> wrote: > What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem > superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more > developer interest and active development. > > Are there any users still using ccd(4) and/or raid(4) and unable to > upgrade to softraid(4)? Will anyone be up a creek if ccd(4)/raid(4) > were removed?
- Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Matthew Dempsky
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Kenneth R Westerback
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Matthew Dempsky
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Kenneth R Westerback
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Joel Sing
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Matthew Dempsky
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Benny Lofgren
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Joel Sing
- Re: sd<n> allocation and umass(4... Christopher Zimmermann
- Re: sd<n> allocation and uma... Alexander Polakov
- Re: sd<n> allocation an... Christopher Zimmermann
- Re: sd<n> allocatio... Matthias Kilian
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Benny Lofgren
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Christian Weisgerber
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Thordur Bjornsson
- Re: Future of ccd(4) and raid(4)? Joel Sing