On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 03:38:48PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What should be done about ccd(4) and raid(4)? They both seem > > superseded in functionality by softraid(4), which also has much more > > developer interest and active development. > > Is softraid ready at all? I thought it was experimental, under > construction, incomplete, don't-use-unless-you-want-to-contribute > code. I'm pretty sure it left that state some time ago, in all fairness I'd sooner trust softraid for my data then ccd/raidframe.
softraid needs some of the bells and whistles raidframe has as Benny already pointed out, but I think ccd(4) ought to go the way of the Dodo.
