On Mon, Jul 18, 2011, Marc Espie wrote: > If we start adding this to some tools, it would start to make sense to > support it at the source. > > Namely, conversion functions are a bit annoying, and it's always possible > to fuck it up. Plus, same code twice = same bugs. > > Is there anything preventing us from adding non-standard flags to regcomp(3) > and do it directly there ?
Yeah, see the later email, it's actually less code to add it to regcomp.
