On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:20:01AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:31:39 +1000 > > > From: Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> > > > > > > Both gcc and clang have an extension for binary integer constants. > > > In gcc's case this has been around since 4.3. > > > > > > The mesa backend for newer intel parts (i965) assumes this extension > > > is present in recent versions. > > > > Sigh... Can't these people just write portable C? > > > > > Below is a diff to add support for this to our in tree gcc4. While the > > > i965 backend is only built on gcc4 archs the concern is that abuse > > > of this extension in ports or other places may make gcc3/gcc2 archs > > > worse off unless similiar patches can be done... > > > > Well, lots of ports stuff is compiled with newer gcc versions anyway. > > Actually, not so many: > > $echo "select count(*) from modules where value='gcc4';" | > sqlite3/usr/local/share/sqlports > 34 > > And if you rip out all the subpackages, the actual list is: > > audio/mscore > editors/libreoffice > lang/classpath > lang/luajit > net/rtorrent > print/cups-filters > textproc/pdftk > www/mozilla-firefox > www/seamonkey > www/squid
Oh and of course as soon as we enable webkit2 api, www/webkit will also need recent gcc/clang for c++11 stuff. And mail/mozilla-thunderbird too in 3 months when the 24 branch is released. Landry
