On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:03 PM, David Coppa <dco...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>>> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:07:58 -0800
>>> From: Martynas Venckus <marty...@venck.us>
>>>
>>> Yup.    Does this diff fix it for you?
>>
>> Here's a diff that sticks a bit closer to the original code.  It's
>> equivalent to your diff, and admittedly purely a matter of taste which
>> version to prefer.
>>
>> Index: s_floorl.c
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /home/cvs/src/lib/libm/src/ld80/s_floorl.c,v
>> retrieving revision 1.2
>> diff -u -p -r1.2 s_floorl.c
>> --- s_floorl.c  25 Jul 2011 16:20:09 -0000      1.2
>> +++ s_floorl.c  7 Feb 2014 14:43:19 -0000
>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ floorl(long double x)
>>                 if(huge+x>0.0) {/* return 0*sign(x) if |x|<1 */
>>                     if(sx==0) {se=0;i0=i1=0;}
>>                     else if(((se&0x7fff)|i0|i1)!=0)
>> -                       { se=0xbfff;i0=i1=0;}
>> +                       { se=0xbfff;i0=0x80000000;i1=0;}
>>                 }
>>             } else {
>>                 i = (0x7fffffff)>>jj0;
>>
>
> Just tested, and this one works too, of course...
>
> I'd be happy if this or the other one could be committed.

Ping

Reply via email to