On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Martynas Venckus
<marty...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote:
>> Here's a diff that sticks a bit closer to the original code.  It's
>> equivalent to your diff, and admittedly purely a matter of taste which
>> version to prefer.
>
> I prefer my version better.  It's not '93 anymore and compilers are
> able to convert 0.0L and -1.0L precisely, otherwise we have a huge
> problem.  There's no need to obfuscate here by manually converting
> to floating point representation.
>
> Here's a diff which also includes same fix for ld128.  OK?

OK with me.

Ciao,
David


> Index: ld128/s_floorl.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libm/src/ld128/s_floorl.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -r1.1 s_floorl.c
> --- ld128/s_floorl.c    6 Jul 2011 00:02:42 -0000       1.1
> +++ ld128/s_floorl.c    11 Feb 2014 05:24:15 -0000
> @@ -34,10 +34,11 @@
>         jj0 = ((i0>>48)&0x7fff)-0x3fff;
>         if(jj0<48) {
>             if(jj0<0) {         /* raise inexact if x != 0 */
> -               if(huge+x>0.0) {/* return 0*sign(x) if |x|<1 */
> -                   if(i0>=0) {i0=i1=0;}
> +               if(huge+x>0.0) {
> +                   if(i0>=0)
> +                       return 0.0L;
>                     else if(((i0&0x7fffffffffffffffLL)|i1)!=0)
> -                       { i0=0xbfff000000000000ULL;i1=0;}
> +                       return -1.0L;
>                 }
>             } else {
>                 i = (0x0000ffffffffffffULL)>>jj0;
> Index: ld80/s_floorl.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libm/src/ld80/s_floorl.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -u -r1.2 s_floorl.c
> --- ld80/s_floorl.c     25 Jul 2011 16:20:09 -0000      1.2
> +++ ld80/s_floorl.c     11 Feb 2014 05:24:01 -0000
> @@ -35,10 +35,11 @@
>         jj0 = (se&0x7fff)-0x3fff;
>         if(jj0<31) {
>             if(jj0<0) { /* raise inexact if x != 0 */
> -               if(huge+x>0.0) {/* return 0*sign(x) if |x|<1 */
> -                   if(sx==0) {se=0;i0=i1=0;}
> +               if(huge+x>0.0) {
> +                   if(sx==0)
> +                       return 0.0L;
>                     else if(((se&0x7fff)|i0|i1)!=0)
> -                       { se=0xbfff;i0=i1=0;}
> +                       return -1.0L;
>                 }
>             } else {
>                 i = (0x7fffffff)>>jj0;
>

Reply via email to