On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 13:56 -0500, patric conant wrote: > > I'd also like to point out that Shawn has broken the social contract > > here, it's well known that it's generally considered rude to direct > > developers, in this forum. > > Every single free or open-source software project I have ever used has > been shaped by user feedback. Most take it seriously when users say they > still use functionality that's being slated for removal. So Patric, you > can take this "social contract" of yours and shove it up your ass. I > don't recognize it as anything but toilet paper. > And the ports devs did listen ***seriously***. bcallah@ provided an initial port and sthen@ gave some feedback. It might make it into the ports tree.Are you not subscribed to ports@? Lynx is probably just a pkg_add away. Or if that effort is abandoned, you can whip up your own port based on bcallah@ initial port. This project is also shaped by user feedback. Otherwise, those two wouldn't have bothered wasting their time on lynx.
