On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:30:12PM -0600, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Gilles Chehade <gil...@poolp.org> wrote: > > Now, if you auth using another mechanism (ie: listen [...] auth <table>) > > in theory we do not have the same limitation but I think it will fail as > > we share some code path and we probably have a check in there. I'll have > > a look at this. > > > > Hi Gilles >
Hi, > Did you happen to have a chance to check into this? I know you must be very > busy and I have a little of C experience so maybe can you refer me to some > specific documentation/code so I can help fixing this? > Nope, I have opened a ticket so the issue doesn't get lost, I did look a bit to check if it could be quick-fixed, but it'll require a bit of work and I'm swamped at the moment :-/ Feel free to have a look, I'll review your diffs and point you to proper directions, however it's not a simple define fix so expect some work ;-) Either way it'll be fixed in the next two weeks hopefully. > Thank you for your time, and thanks for opensmtpd > np -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
