On 26/03/15(Thu) 17:46, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Mike Belopuhov <m...@belopuhov.com> [2015-03-26 14:36]:
> > On 26 March 2015 at 14:27, Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> > > seems reasonable. (I'd quite like that for v4 too, though it wouldn't
> > > cope with non-contiguous netmask ;)
> > non-contiguous netmasks for IPv4 addresses configured on an interface?
> > is that possible? what's the use case?
> > perhaps you're confusing this with non-contiguous netmasks in the radix
> > tree that are entered by the ipsec flows containing port numbers?
>
> I don't think we need to worry about non-contiguous netmasks here.
My plan is to stop supporting them in the routing table first... Does
that ring any bell? :o)
So let's start simple, CIDR notation for IPv6, ok?
Index: ifconfig.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c,v
retrieving revision 1.296
diff -u -p -r1.296 ifconfig.c
--- ifconfig.c 5 Feb 2015 10:30:25 -0000 1.296
+++ ifconfig.c 26 Mar 2015 17:15:54 -0000
@@ -3192,7 +3192,7 @@ in6_alias(struct in6_ifreq *creq)
warn("SIOCGIFNETMASK_IN6");
} else {
sin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&ifr6.ifr_addr;
- printf(" prefixlen %d", prefix(&sin6->sin6_addr,
+ printf("/%d", prefix(&sin6->sin6_addr,
sizeof(struct in6_addr)));
}
