Chris Bennett wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 09:18:14PM -0500, Michael McConville wrote: > > Chris Bennett wrote: > > > I found a subroutine in printjob.c called sendmail with uses > > > _PATH_SENDMAIL. > > > > > > I found it all over the place: > > > > Are you implying that they should be replaced? IIUC, we create a > > sendmail binary (or at least a link) even though we no longer > > technically use sendmail. See usr.sbin/mailwrapper. > > > > That said, _PATH_SENDMAIL could be deprecated for other reasons. I'm > > just guessing at what you meant. > > > > Well, sendmail is no longer in base. > But sendmail is installable from ports.
Right, but we emulate it by using the same binary name. I'm not sure whether there's a suggested alternative. It seems if there were an easy replacement, the existing _PATH_SENDMAIL uses would have been removed.
