> On 2 Jun 2016, at 4:28 AM, Theo de Raadt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As I said, we could still change the name of the interface to 'ubm' >> while keeping 'umbim' as the name of the driver. > > No, I don't understand the proposal. I think it should be ubm > throughout, or I am threatening to rename ix(4) to a 8 character > name.
intel10g(4) is far less ambiguous.
