Theo de Raadt wrote: > I'm not sure the direction this goes. > > Today atalk, and over the next month delete 20 protocols, then anything > before ARP? > > What's the plan here. This code is heavily privsep, pledge, etc. Is > there a problem with it? > > If such a packet showed up on a network I'd prefer it is *identified* > in some minimal way, rather than a set of HEX digits that I have to > google for to do that myself. It seems this code provides exactly > that service.
so if it shortens the man page, that's a plus. maybe we can just trim some of the example. it seems a little verbose for something rarely used. > > > Remove atalk support. Significantly shortens the manpage. libpcap still > > supports it. This diff doesn't include the removal of two files: > > appletalk.h and print-atalk.c.
