On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 07:30:34PM +0200, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
| Hi Paul,
|
| > Is there any specific marking on the device to suggest it's from HP?
|
| oh, indeed. The photo at [1] shows the display with a prominent "HP" logo.
|
| [1] https://mastodon.social/@jpmens/100220482259778231
Oh, that looks like a weird device, that may not be uplcom(4) at all.
On the other hand, it may still be, just with a uplcom chip in it to
talk to it. Only one way to find out :)
| > Will it work with the uplcom(4) driver? Who knows. Try this (written
| > against -current, so may apply with a little bit of fuzz:
|
| I'll have to learn how to build from source and find the time to do so. I
| don't know when I'll be able to do so but will then report back.
To test that I didn't screw up the diff I sent you, I did build a
kernel with it. If you trust me (you shouldn't I'm a stranger from
the internet), I'm happy to send you my kernel so you can give it a
try. I *think* it should work without problems on 6.3, but I'm not
100% sure. At least you should be able to boot in single user mode
(boot -s) and see if the device works that way.
Contact me off-list if you want to give it a try :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
