On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> On 20/01/20(Mon) 16:42, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > Diff below is a refactoring of the actual em(4) code and defines that
> > will allows me to present a shorter diff to interrupt multiple CPUs and
> > make use of multiple queues.
> > 
> > It contains the following items:
> > 
> >   - Abstract the allocation/freeing of TX/RX ring into em_dma_malloc().
> >     This will ease the introduction of multiple rings.
> > 
> >   - Split the 82576 variant out of 82575.  The distinction is necessary
> >     when it comes to setting multiple queues.
> > 
> >   - Change multiple TX/RX related macro to take an index argument
> >     corresponding to a ring.  Currently only the index 0 and 1 are used.
> > 
> >   - Gather and print more stats counters
> > 
> >   - Switch to using a function, like FreeBSD, to translate 82542
> >     registers and get rid of a set of defines.
> > 
> > It has been tested one the models below, I'd like to be sure there isn't
> > any fallout with this part before continuing the effort.
> 
> New diff that works with 82576, previous breakage reported by Hrvoje
> Popovski.  So far the following models have been tested, I'm looking for
> more tests :o)
> 
>     em3 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82571EB" rev 0x06: apic 0 int 16
>     em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82572EI" rev 0x06: apic 0 int 16
>     em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82576" rev 0x01: msi          
>     em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel 82577LM" rev 0x06: msi
>     em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel 82579LM" rev 0x04: msi
>     em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel I217-LM" rev 0x04: msi
>     em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel I218-V" rev 0x03: msi
>     em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 Intel I218-LM rev 0x04: msi
>     em0 at pci0 dev 31 function 6 "Intel I219-V" rev 0x21: msi
>     em0 at pci7 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I350" rev 0x01: msi

Lightly tested on 82575 here:

em0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 82575GB" rev 0x02: msi

no problems seen.

I read through the previous version and the only issues I saw were fixed in
the second version.

Reply via email to