On 31/01/20(Fri) 13:46, Mike Larkin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 09:15:35AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > On 21/01/20(Tue) 12:31, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > On 20/01/20(Mon) 16:42, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > > Diff below is a refactoring of the actual em(4) code and defines that > > > > will allows me to present a shorter diff to interrupt multiple CPUs and > > > > make use of multiple queues. > > > > > > > > It contains the following items: > > > > > > > > - Abstract the allocation/freeing of TX/RX ring into em_dma_malloc(). > > > > This will ease the introduction of multiple rings. > > > > > > > > - Split the 82576 variant out of 82575. The distinction is necessary > > > > when it comes to setting multiple queues. > > > > > > I see in the diff where this is being done, but is the multi-queue part not > in this diff? Just looks like you separated things, and left it at that?
No it is not :) > [...] > You can add this to the "works as intended" list (t490): > > em0 at pci0 dev 31 function 6 "Intel I219-LM" rev 0x30: msi > > Diff reads ok to me. So ok mlarkin@ if you are still looking for oks and > didn't > commit it already. Thanks!
