On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:19:24PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote: > this is getting in my nerves, I made a wrong assumption here and I > prefer to commit this than backout my previous commit so I'm asking for > commits for the below. Wasn't there another daemon as well that stopped unlinking the socket in favour of fewer pledge promises?
Given that control_init() does unlink the control socket early on, I think this is a sensible approach, OK kn.
