Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:19:24PM +0100, Ricardo Mestre wrote: > > this is getting in my nerves, I made a wrong assumption here and I > > prefer to commit this than backout my previous commit so I'm asking for > > commits for the below. > Wasn't there another daemon as well that stopped unlinking the socket > in favour of fewer pledge promises? > > Given that control_init() does unlink the control socket early on, I > think this is a sensible approach, OK kn.
the test is whether the control-program behaves nicely with a dead control socket
