Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > Not having read the code, case in point on principle, I'm arguing that > > there should be solid reasoning to enable it by default, as those with a > > need for it can certainly enable it and build a kernel. > > It's not that simple, using a custom kernel means you can't use syspatches > so are more likely to stay on a vulnerable version if a kernel bug is fixed.
I am perfectly happy if Balder is running a custom kernel.
