Pekka Savola wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
Let me (repeat) state that my opinion is that we SHOULD be able
to achieve RFC-publication within 2 months (or less) after
IESG approval. And if we can achieve that, then I maintain
that early stable references is farr less of a problem (if at all).
Just my personal opinion of course.
I would rather work on trying to get to a fast-publication-after-approval
than thinking of stop-ga[p measures to deal with too-slow-publication.
FWIW, I agree completely. If you add fast-tracking to this, we should
already have enough tools to allow fast document publication in general,
and even faster when required.
That is all true. But I don't believe that the permanent identifier issue
is a big deal. In fact, I bet you that today the RFC number is internally
assigned pretty much as soon as a draft gets in the publication queue.
The question is when it gets published, and that is something we can
choose quite independently of everything else. I think it's important
that the IETF states a requirement that this publication occurs when we
need it to occur.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
