ok, I understand the desire to partition the work.

pub-req will be agnostic with respect to:
- What a stable permanent identifier is and how many classes of identifiers 
there are
- Who owns and who assigns the stable permanent identifiers

Godspeed to the newtrk work on this.

Stephen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 2:37 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Techspec] New requirement for early permanent ID
> allocation
> 
> 
> From: "John C Klensin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> >> It is also recommended that the technical publisher retains
> >> control of the allocation of permanent identifiers.  This is
> >> especially true when multiple organizations (IESG, IAB, IRTF)
> >> share a single identifier sequence.  One way that this might
> >> work is for the IESG to request "publication" or "publication
> >> with early allocation"
> >
> > Please separate this into a separate issue.  To the extent to
> > which we are going to maintain multiple sets of numbers, some of
> > which apply to subsets of the others, the standards-track
> > reference ID (currently STD, but its assignment only to Full
> > Standards is another NEWTRK issue) and other reference IDs
> > should arguably be controlled directly by some IASA-associated
> > entity or contractor that is different from the technical
> > publisher.  I understand this effort to be defining a "technical
> > publisher" role.  If that role is to be one of a publisher,
> > rather than having broader standards-management functions, then
> > we had better be _very_ careful about what the IDs are and who
> > assigns them.
> 
> I agree with John here. I'm not sure I understand the case 
> for continuing 
> current practice, at a minimum.
> 
> > And, again, who assigns the identifier is a very different issue
> > from when  that identifier is assigned.
> 
> Ack. 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Techspec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
> 

_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec

Reply via email to